Evidence before assertion
Every candidate points to a source reference. If the source is weak or absent, the workflow asks for more evidence instead of silently guessing.
Method note / rev 0.1
The product helps teams organise evidence and prepare recovery decisions. It does not certify materials, replace site professionals, or guarantee reuse demand.
Every candidate points to a source reference. If the source is weak or absent, the workflow asks for more evidence instead of silently guessing.
Confidence is expressed as a reason and required next action—not a decorative percentage that implies more certainty than exists.
Hazard, structural, contamination, quantity, and destination decisions remain subject to competent-person review.
Model proposals may misidentify material, condition, connection, or quantity.
Visual evidence cannot establish hidden contamination, structural capacity, or legal compliance.
Demand matches in the demonstration are synthetic—not live offers or guaranteed transactions.
Potential impact is a transparent scenario estimate, not a verified environmental claim.
Approved outputs must retain source evidence, rule version, reviewer, date, and stated limitations.